top of page
Recent Posts
Featured Posts

OPPOSITION GOES TO COURT OVER NIDS

The Parliamentary Opposition, this morning, filed an action in the Supreme Court seeking a declaration that sections of the National Identification and Registration (NIDS) Act 2017breach guaranteed constitutional rights of Jamaican citizens and legal permanent residents of Jamaica.

It is also seeking an order that the sections are null and void and should be struck down.

The action taken by the Opposition comes against the background of the Bill being rushed through both Houses of Parliament despite the pleas for amendments from the Parliamentary Opposition and several civil society groups, including the Bar Association of Jamaica, that the Bill be sent to a Joint Select Committee of both Houses of Parliament for more deliberation on aspects of the proposed Act.

“The People’s National Party (PNP) supports the concept of a national identification system and the use of modern technology in the administration of critical government services; however, the NIDS Act is flawed,” PNP President Dr. Peter Phillips said.

The Fixed Date Claim Form filed in court says Sections 6(1), 20, 23, 27(1), 30, 36(4), 39, 41 (1), 43(1) and 60 as well as the third and sixth schedules all breach Section 13 of the Jamaican Constitution. The sixth schedule further breaches the right of every citizen of Jamaica to be granted a passport and not to be deprived or denied, except by due process of law.

The Fixed Date Claim Form also seeks a declaration that neither the manner nor the extent of the abrogation, abridgement or infringement of the constitutional right is demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

The Opposition is further asking for a declaration that the provisions of Chapter 111 of the Constitution are likely to be contravened in relation to the claimant, other Jamaican citizens and legal permanent residents of Jamaica by the provisions of the Act.

As a result, the Opposition said, it was seeking an order that the sections are null and void and are of no effect and should be struck down. It also said it was seeking other remedies necessary to give legal effect to the declarations as well as costs.

The claimant in the suit is Member of Parliament for South East St. Andrew and General Secretary of the People’s National Party, Julian Robinson.

The Parliamentary Opposition is being represented by former Solicitor General, Michael Hylton, Q.C., and Attorneys Michael Vaccianna, Donna Scott-Mottley, Jennifer Housen and Sophia Frazer Binns.

Follow Us
Search By Tags
Archive
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
bottom of page